1/1/21 –

On 12/31/20 the S&P 500 closed at 3756 resulting in a total return of 18.40% for the year, closing out the very volatile COVID year. The return of the S&P 500 index for long-term investors is only 4.20%. The problem for investors is the very low rates on long-term governments. This could change in the future. Given present mutual fund alternatives, the current income yield of a 50/50 portfolio of intermediate term bonds and stocks is around 1.5%. For a portfolio to also handle inflation *, it is necessary to live within income. This is far off the 4% rule of thumb, that had been the portfolio management norm in the past. Considering how present conditions might reasonably change, we are going to have to settle for a total portfolio income yield between those two figures, but surely higher than the present.


In its September, 2020 Economic Projections Report the Federal Reserve confirmed its pledge to keep short-term interest rates near zero for years. It noted the following changes:

                                     Median Estimated Policy Path

                                       2020           2021          2022

     Fed Funds Rate           0.1              0.1             0.1

     12/20 Projections        1.6              1.9             2.1

We will discuss how new economic conditions brought these changes about and their implications for the real economy, savers and investors in the financial markets.


The Real Economy

The most obvious factor affecting these Fed projections is the COVID-19 pandemic. In one year, the scientific community (building upon many prior years of fundamental research) has developed vaccines and begun to distribute them widely, doing what Americans do best – developing and distributing new products at broad scale. These truly hopeful achievements, however, have occurred against the backdrop of an horrific second wave of the coronavirus, which by the end of this winter, might have taken more lives than the 407,000 U.S. military casualties in W.W. II.

The first wave of the virus resulted in a K shaped recovery in a predominately service economy, sparing the jobs of those who could work in the rapidly developing online economy, but badly affecting the traditional jobs that involved contact with the public. The S&P 500 projected average operating earnings dropped 22.8% between 12/31/19 and 12/31/20. This is less severe than the 37.9% 34.5% during the Great Recession between 9/30/08 and 9/30/09. The two major factors explaining this difference were that the present drop has not involved the financial system, which is better capitalized; and the Fed’s policy response to lower interest rates rapidly is decisive. But, in the absence of fiscal policy from Congress, interest rates are now at the zero bound and the U.S. is facing a second wave of the virus, the 9/9/20 WP reports, “Jerome Powell, chair of the Fed, has repeatedly said that his institution can’t keep equity and debt assets stabilized if the economy continues to deteriorate.…Despite this grim reality, the Senate on Thursday rejected a stimulus bill.”

Giving the real economy time to adapt, to adjust to new circumstances, should be a major priority.


Impact Upon Savers

But the above is not without cost to savers. Interest rates have trended lower in successive economic shocks, beginning with Long-Term Capital in 1998, the 2008 financial crisis and now the COVID crisis – this decline due to a continued decline in the natural rate of interest, the interest rate that supports the economy at full unemployment while keeping inflation constant. According to a 2016 speech by Fed Governor Lael Brainard, the natural rate of interest is now “close to zero.”

The reason why this has happened is structural changes in the economy. To give a simple example of this from the 12/15/20 Bloomberg, “…Butler County…straddles the suburbs and exurbs of Pittsburgh…the fate of an AK Steel plant on the outskirts of Butler that bills itself as the only U.S. producer of electrical steel used in transformers remains uncertain.” Transformer steel is a very pure specialized steel that avoids power losses. Industrial companies, such as AK Steel, are asset-heavy and provide investors with a demand for capital. Globalization and the significant deindustrialization of the economy are the likely reasons why the natural rate of interest has declined.

“Thanks to government action, many metrics of economic pain, such as bankruptcies and evictions, look better than they did before the pandemic. But economists…say that government help is just holding back a tide that may be unavoidable in the end - too many companies can’t last for long in an environment of reduced demand. (A typical small business requires about 70% capacity utilization to break even.) This state of suspended animation applies as well to corporate America, which has benefited from the Federal Reserve’s dramatic cuts in interest rates and moves to support credit markets. A Bloomberg analysis of financial data from 3,000 of the of the country’s largest publicly traded companies found that 1 in 5 were not earning enough to cover the cost of servicing interest on their debt, rendering them financial zombies. Collectively those companies – among them Boeing, Delta Air Lines, Exxon Mobil and Macy’s - have added almost $1 trillion in debt to their balance sheets since the beginning of the pandemic.”

The above suggests that the market economy has painted itself into a corner of zero interest rates. As has become increasingly obvious, the health of your future investments depends upon the health of the U.S. economy, which increasingly requires government to deal with large and unavoidable problems requiring capital: the COVID epidemic, economic growth, climate change and inequality.


The Impact on Investors in the Financial Markets

One might think that decreasing real interest rates will inevitably lead to higher stock prices. But, historically, this has not been so. The present high level of the U. S. stock market is an exception. This really useful 12/20 chart by Minack Advisors charts Robert Shiller’s S&P Composite monthly inflation and cyclically adjusted P/E against the real ten year treasury rate for the years 1925 to 2020.


It shows that, with the present exception, the stock market declines when business is either very good (and all interest rates increase) or very bad (and expected short-term earnings decrease). This graph also shows why the financial planning mantra, “Keep to your plan” usually works – but not, we think, now. Interest rates at the zero bound have reduced portfolio income yields to inconsequential levels and the current graph data point, shown by the red dot, shows a very high valuation relative to the negative 10 year real treasury rate. Usually, this mantra works because the very large preponderance of lower stock P/Es are located in the right hand side of the graph, where real treasury returns are positive and P/E values tend to be lower.

The reason why low current interest rates result in high stock prices is due to the preponderance of the five FAANG stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google) which now account for 15% of the S&P 500. Business has been good for these companies, although interest rates are low. But, do you want the continued performance of your now non-diversified S&P 500 to depend on the 2X or more overvalued growth companies? Does this sound familiar, like the Internet stocks or the one-decision Nifty Fifty of the past? **

Furthermore, U.S. inflation might increase for the following reasons:

1)    Sustained economic activity, financed either by continued government subsidies if the economy doesn’t restart on its own; or financed by the capital markets if it does.

2)    The continued need to finance deficits as the government makes the necessary capital expenditures to repair our society.

3)    The trade-weighted dollar has declined.

The major risk is this: What if the real 10 year treasury rate increases from -1% to 0%, which would cause investors in that bond to simply break even in real terms after a Fed targeted 2% inflation. With increased inflation, there could be a limit to the Fed put, the ability of the central bank to keep purchasing financial assets, thus further increasing the M2 money supply. This is a market for momentum investors only. The trend is your friend, until it isn’t.                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Using our nominal interest rate stock market markup model, the long-term return of the S&P 500 could increase to 5.20%.

          Financial Conditions (12/18/20)


                0% Policy rate

             .86% 10 year treasury premium +1%

           2.24% BAA corporate bond premium

           1.10% Equity risk premium

          4.20% Equity return                      +1%


Our readers can calculate what the large S&P 500 drop would be, or they can (with one additional assumption) solve the problem on the graph above.



Do finance or economics people know what the drawn curve at the right is? We will discuss this in a future essay.

Does real and sustainable economic growth matter? We think it does very much; but over more than one business cycle.





*Inflation is always a significant long-term threat to the real value of your portfolio. Stocks, a claim on equity in real assets, are supposed to be a hedge against inflation. But one of our earlier studies, using data for the 32 years from 1968 to 1999, found that the coefficient of the willingness of investors to buy stocks, rather than bonds, was negative.


Bond Yields(t)

___________________                          = .022 * cap util(t+1) - .079 * infl(t+1)

Stock Earnings Yields(t)


               where:                       Bond Yields are the long term AA utility rate.

                                                 Stock Earnings Yields are trailing S&P 500 operating

                                                 earnings divided by the current level of the S&P 500.

                ρ2 = .95 out of 1       This model no longer fits the current data.


Our essay discusses why.




The reason for this negative sign was that we were using yearly data. When expected inflation increases, and do interest rates, the stock market goes down. However, when inflation decreases and interest rates go down, the effect of prior inflation remains on the companies’ balance sheets and income statements. Thus, for long-term investors, it can be said that stocks are a hedge against inflation.


** There is a saying, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” We much respect history, but some historically confused people within it don’t choose. Which stock market event could be the most relevant? Is the better analogy the Internet crash of 2001 or the Nifty Fifty crash of 1973? In spite of the technology, we think it is the latter because that crash involved highly valued large companies, which were “one-decision” investments, companies exhibiting solid earnings growth for a long period of time. According to the Wikipedia, “Because of the (subsequent) underperformance of most of the nifty fifty list, it is often cited as an example of unrealistic investor expectations for growth stocks.”


Our markup model for measuring S&P 500 returns will likely remain valid. Here is a quick analysis of the details:


Level S&P 500   CAPE  Earnings Yield   CAPEx1.33   10 Yr. Treasury    Equity Markup

10/73  109.8                      5.25%                     6.98%               6.91%                     .07%             

09/74    68.1                      9.11%                   12.12%               7.38%                   4.74%


What prompted the 38% S&P 500 correction was the oil shock of 1973-74, that quadrupled the price of oil from $3/bbl. to nearly $12/bbl. Stock market corrections of overvaluations, such as the above, require catalysts. In 1973-1974, the main overvaluation was in the S&P 500. Now, the temporary overvaluation is in all financial assets due to the COVID crisis. The current long-term ROI of the stock market is only 4.20%.




To discuss the future:


There are two major streams of Western political thought. The first goes back to Plato and the ancient Greeks. In this view, the state reflects a balanced human nature, a balance of powers among Reason, Spiritedness and Desire. This view, according to Harvard Professor Danielle Allen (2013), resulted in the administrative state, modifying Athens’ direct democracy. This state, relying upon Reason, requires foresight and competence.


The second, the Romantic movement, was in direct reaction to the Enlightenment. In “The Roots of Romanticism,” Isaiah Berlin (1999) wrote, “Fascism too is an inheritor of romanticism, not because it is irrational - plenty of movements have been that – nor because of a belief in elites – plenty of movements have held that belief. The reason why Fascism owes something to romanticism is, again, because of the notion of the unpredictable will either of man or of a group which forges forward in some fashion that is impossible to organize (sound familiar?), impossible to predict, impossible to rationalize. That is the whole heart of Fascism: what the leader will say tomorrow, how the spirit will move us, where we shall go, what we shall do – that cannot be foretold. The hysterical self-assertion and the nihilistic destruction of existing institutions because they confine the unlimited will, which is the only thing which counts for human beings; the superior person who crushes the inferior because his will is stronger…”


In the 2020 election, 74 MM Americans voted for the candidate of the extreme right for President. We might consider the consequences of trying to row in difficult weather, not having both oars in the water.


Some political expressions excel in local color. Charlie Dent, (House R-Pa ret.) said on the 12/28/20 CNN, that the leaving President's many legal challenges to the election have been, "Beaten like a rented mule."




But the losing and outgoing President will try anything to stay in office. The Washington Post obtained a one hour phone call with Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger:


Trump: I just want to find 11,780 votes (which will give me victory in the state)…


Trump: You should want to have an accurate election. And you’re a Republican.


Raffensperger: We believe that we do have an accurate election.


Trump: No, no, you don’t. No, no, you don’t. You don’t have….You’re off by hundreds of thousands of votes. You know what they did and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense.You can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer….But they are shredding ballots, in my opinion based on what I’ve heard. And they are removing machinery…You know, I mean, I’m notifying you. (an outright threat)            


Raffensperger: Mr. President, you have people that submit information, and we have our people that submit information, and then it comes before the court…(that already ruled against Trump)


Trump: Well, under the law, you’re not allowed to give faulty election results, okay?...This is a faulty election result….And you would be respected, really respected if this thing could be straightened out before the (senatorial) election.



How can anyone who supports the Republican party stand for this? It can finally be seen that the thirst of Senators Cruz, Hawley and Vice-President Michael Pence for higher office exceeds their devotion to our country and our democratic system.


As the Bard wrote, “Out, damned spot…”, the lot.




In his bunker, Hitler moved around imaginary army divisions and gave orders to burn Paris. After losing the presidency, the Senate and the House for a blinded Republican Party, Donald Trump sought non-existent voters and then on January 6 encouraged his supporters to unleash chaos, as Congress voted to certify Joe Biden as president.


                                                                                                                                                   CNN 1/6/21


                                                                                                                                                                            CNN 1/6/21

                                                                                        This Senate chamber inscription can be translated, “Providence favors our undertakings.”


A historian once noted that U.S. democracy could end, all it would take is two bad presidents. Two terms of Donald Trump’s disastrous presidency could have ended our democracy. It is now obvious that a lawless and violent conservatism, concerned only with the concentration of power for its own sake, can culminate in chaos – as it did many years ago.